| Different visions of the future (1925-2005)
|
Plan Voisin for Paris, 1925, Le Corbusier The vision of the zoned modernist city built with standardized industrial construction
|
Connected Communication
eyes and ears - hands and mouth Architects are communicators. We
express ourselves verbally and dimensionally; however, as communicators,
we must also have the capacity to observe our world, listen to many interests,
and synthesise this into our own source of wisdom and inspiration.
In other words, we must find meaning from our experiences and add substance
to our expression. History has shown that not all proposed architectural
solutions have proven beneficial. As a visual profession, architecture
has the power to ‘show’ people what is possible. This is part of
the alchemy of architecture and ideally, it is a response to and a reflection
upon our connection with our local community.
I find that Architects’ biggest challenge
is connecting the profession to our communities and successfully relating
to the local human condition. In 1925, Le Corbusier proposed the
Plan Voisin for Paris. The modernist vision, to which Le Corbusier
greatly contributed, lead to the building of St. Louis's disastrous Pruitt-Igoe
social housing project. In a similar spirit of innovation, well respected
Frank Lloyd Wright proposed Broadacre City (1934-58) where deurbanisation
was the answer to a better way of life. At the beginning of the 21st
century, we are faced with the disequilibrium of suburban sprawl and environmental
degradation.
From the concrete to the virtual:
the power of the image is competing with the once powerful presence of
the built environment. The media for communicating ideas have evolved.
Take for example, the power of television, movies, and the internet.
Images of the future from Hanna-Barbera’s cartoon, The Jetsons in the 1960s,
movies such as Ridley Scott’s 1982 film, Blade Runner, and the city of
Coruscant from George Lucas’ Star Wars II in 2002 are full of social commentary.
Are these images becoming self-fulfilling prophecies? Are these the
societies that we want to construct? Architect’s have a role to play
in proposing healthy solutions that respond to social concerns, local economics,
and the environment.
In the 1960s and 70s, the utopian future
of Buckminster Fuller’s geodesic domes was contrasted by films such as
Michael Anderson’s, Logan’s Run in 1976 and Richard Fleischer’s, Soylent
Green in 1973. I believe that the challenge for Architects is to
participate in an accretive architecture that repairs existing built conditions
and helps a community to evolve within its cultural and historical context.
The era of tabula rasa is over. We cannot afford to throw our buildings
away and start again. The future success of cities will depend upon
how well they adapt their existing conditions to ecological and democratic
practises.
Through our skills of observation and our
talents for visual creation, Architects are very well positioned to supply
healthy ideas and images to the social discourse. This is a public
role that Architects can continue to play and as such, it must also be
a democratic role so that ideas can be openly vetted and understood.
This does much more than improve the ‘image’ of the architectural profession;
our thoughtful intervention can contribute to the meaning and experience
of civilisation.
14 March 2005
|
|
back |
|